The revelation that U.S. authorities secretly transported migrants on undisclosed flights into the country, coupled with Elon Musk‘s stark warnings, has thrust President Joe Biden‘s immigration policies into the spotlight. Musk alleges a perilous strategy, likening it to “importing voters” and raising concerns about national security that could surpass the impact of 9/11.

Covert Flights and Immigration Policies Unveiled

According to a report by India Today, United States authorities have confirmed the use of secret flights to bring migrants into the U.S., an admission that comes amid efforts to shift blame onto Texas for the escalating big-city migrant crisis. Contrary to claims placing responsibility on Texas and its program of busing illegal immigrants, a new investigation reveals President Biden’s clandestine operation, flying in hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants from Latin American airports to 43 U.S. cities.

Biden’s Secretive Immigration Maneuvers Exposed

In 2023, the Biden administration reportedly facilitated overnight flights for approximately 320,000 migrants, aiming to diminish border crossings. The revelation has triggered backlash, with critics pointing to potential national security threats and questioning the transparency of such a significant immigration operation, as per a report by India Today.

Elon Musk’s Alarming Warning: A Parallel to 9/11

Billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, sharing a report on the covert migrant transfers, expressed grave concerns. Musk described the operation as “importing voters” and raised an alarming comparison, stating that the groundwork being laid is “far worse than the 9/11 attacks”, as per a report by India Today. His comments draw attention to the potential consequences of uncontrolled immigration and its impact on national security.

Freedom of Information Act Lawsuit Unveils Details

As per a report by Sahara Reporters, a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit has shed light on the secretive flights approved by Biden’s Customs and Border Protection (CBP), transporting hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants into 43 U.S. cities. The CBP’s refusal to disclose specific locations stems from concerns about potential “bad actors” undermining law enforcement efforts, creating a significant point of contention.

Biden’s App-Based Immigration Scheme

Under Biden’s expansion, migrants could apply for asylum using a mobile app from their home countries. This app facilitated the arrival of 320,000 migrants with no legal rights to enter the U.S. The program has raised questions about the legal standing of such initiatives and the transparency surrounding the entry of migrants into the country.

Controversy Surrounding the CBP One App

The CBP One app, a central element of Biden’s immigration strategy, allowed migrants to apply for travel authorization and temporary humanitarian release, effectively bypassing traditional border entry processes. Critics argue that the covert nature of this program raises legal concerns and demands increased transparency to ensure accountability.

Concerns Over National Security and Operational Vulnerabilities

The refusal to disclose flight locations by the CBP has ignited concerns over national security and operational vulnerabilities. According to media reports, critics argue that without transparency, bad actors could exploit the lack of information, posing risks to public safety. The secrecy surrounding the program’s details, including the airports involved, remains a contentious issue.

Republican Calls for Stricter Protocols and Accountability

Republicans are asserting that the southern border remains insecure, emphasizing the need for stricter immigration protocols. The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) contends that the secretive nature of these flights raises legal questions and demands transparency. The refusal to disclose locations leaves many questioning the accountability and effectiveness of Biden’s immigration policies.

As revelations surrounding Biden’s covert immigration strategies surface, public scrutiny grows. Elon Musk’s pointed remarks, invoking the specter of 9/11, underscore the gravity of the situation. The clash between immigration transparency, national security, and the Biden administration’s policies sets the stage for a contentious debate on the future of U.S. immigration practices.

FAQs:

How many immigrants are allowed in the US each year?
According to the Immigration Act of 1990, every country is allocated 7 percent of the total green cards available for family-based and employment-based immigrants. Consequently, each country has a maximum quota of 44,100 family-based immigrants and 14,700 employment-based immigrants for each fiscal year.

Why are so many immigrants coming to the US?
The figure started to increase in 2018, primarily influenced by Central Americans escaping a range of intricate crises, including gang violence, poverty, political repression, and natural disasters. Detentions saw a decline once more in the summer of 2019, a trend attributed by U.S. officials to heightened enforcement efforts by Mexico and Guatemala.

Disclaimer Statement: This content is authored by a 3rd party. The views expressed here are that of the respective authors/ entities and do not represent the views of Economic Times (ET). ET does not guarantee, vouch for or endorse any of its contents nor is responsible for them in any manner whatsoever. Please take all steps necessary to ascertain that any information and content provided is correct, updated, and verified. ET hereby disclaims any and all warranties, express or implied, relating to the report and any content therein.



Source link


administrator

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *